No Hate Here at Playboy, Guys… Just Some Good Ol’, Fun-Lovin’ Power-Rape of Conservative Women
Posted By Vicki McClure Davidson on June 2, 2009
Power-rape: Playboy's newest attack against intelligent conservative women
Playboy magazine is no longer a randy haven for hormone-driven teenage boys who yearn to see exposed female breasts or laugh at a sexy cartoon. Now, it is for all hate-filled statist men out there who are tired of the “sass” from these intelligent conservative women. How dare they!
In the “logical,” left-wing male’s mind, they should all be savagely raped, as detailed in the filthy, poorly written article, “So Right, It’s Wrong.” And sexually assault them in creative, degrading ways so as to not just hurt them physically, but to “teach them a thing or two” and show them “who’s the boss.”
This was no witty political satire. This was brutish hate of the most sleazy, most denigrating kind. A left-wing extremist wrote about the ten conservative women he most wants to sexually degrade and molest—hasn’t some kind of Internet or hate crime law been broken here? If someone I loved was on this list, I’d be going straight to the feds. Or is “hate-crime protection” (cough) only reserved for liberals? This rabid, left-wing hate is growing.
In the current liberal world, gays, pedophiles, and minorities get the laughable added protection of “hate crime” status. But not women. And most certainly, not conservative, Christian women.
Eminem has a vile song out about raping Sarah Palin, Sandra Bernhard wants her viciously raped by black gang members, and Wanda Sykes, Bill Maher, and Janeane Garofalo infer and shout that she’s a racist whore, a slutty bimbo, and a stupid cow; liberals giggle. Carrie Prejean is called foul names by a psycho gay gossip blogger and other liberal bloggers wish she’d be sexually attacked; again, liberals giggle. Ann Coulter is called the “C” word, the “B” word, Obama-bots wish her dead; AGAIN, liberals giggle.
The left-wing, hate-filled misogyny today on the Playboy website is so very much like that levied against women in Afghanistan and other Middle Eastern countries, where women barely qualify as human beings. Defying your father or husband is justification for a girl or woman being beaten to a bloody pulp, being savagely raped by multiple men, or being beheaded.
The ten conservative women on the list, in order: Michelle Malkin, Megyn Kelly, Mary Katharine Ham, Amanda Carpenter, Elisabeth Hasselbeck, Dana Perino, Laura Ingraham, Pamela Geller, Michele Bachmann, Peggy Noonan. Surprising that Loser Scumbag Hack Writer didn’t include Ann Coulter or Sarah Palin.
I can’t say I was ever a fan of Hugh Hefner’s, but I thought of him as a rakish maverick, an innocuous rascal, a savvy businessman with a bevy of adoring beauties at his side, always in bikinis.
Now he’s just a desperate old man watching his overindulgent sex empire crumble during Obama’s recession. His readership and cash flow are so low, he’s laying off Playboy bunnies (no pun intended). With this article, Hef is now pandering to the lowest common denominator. And the scumbag hack who thought long and hard about all his hate-f**k possibilities before he wrote the loathsome article, Guy Cimbalo, is a twisted, nasty little man who still dreams of the high school prom queen he still angrily worships in his memory. When in doubt, fantasize the vulgar “F” word, combine it with other contemptuous verbs or adjectives, to get even with the unattainable beauty for inciting your sexual fantasies but not responding to your hidden charms, and being smitten instead with the football team captain.
Rape isn’t about sex… it’s about power. Fueled by anger.
Snippet from Michelle Malkin (who was at the top of the enraged sex attack list) who saw the article before it was 86′d (no way to totally clean up the language in the snippet, even with multiple asterisks; you’ve been warned):
Of TownHall columnist Amanda Carpenter, Cimbalo writes, “The Hate F**k Rating: This foul temptress is a walking, talking Faustian f**k bargain.” Michelle Malkin is a “highly f**kable Filipina” and a “Beelzebabe.” And “The View”’s Elisabeth Hasselbeck is just begging for defilement: “She’s the clean-cut American sweetheart who elicits our filthiest thoughts. Endlessly perky, this golden goddess probably has her Catholic school uniform still in the closet, and she wouldn’t mind putting it on before taking it off for a session of sweaty, anti-American hate f**king.”
So, yeah, those intelligent conservative women “have it coming to them,” right, Hef and Guy? Attractive women with brains are meant for just one thing, wink wink? If they say anything contrary to your statist, “Obama adoration” mentality, well, “F” that, they’re not real people then. So men are allowed—no, ENCOURAGED—to do to them whatever depraved, heinous act they want. Empowering women in Playboy? Just a joke defined by your own sexist terms, empty rhetoric cashing in on men’s testosterone. You’re both filthy animals.
Why aren’t women’s liberation groups or so-called compassionate liberals decrying this offensive article? Are they still too busy maligning Prejean and Palin and cooing over the troll Perez Hilton?
After the misogynist article was posted for a while—I imagine the blogosphere went absolutely berserk—it was yanked and replaced with a ludicrous error message page featuring a barely clad young woman sticking her tushie in your face. Apparently, though, this piece of crap “article” will appear in the magazine’s print edition. No wonder Hef’s magazine is tanking.
From Pink Elephant Pundit:
Top 10 Conservative Women We’d Love To Hate F**. What a sick, twisted, horrible premise. They list all the heavy hitting conservative women you’d expect – Michelle Malkin being at the head of the pack, with the notable absence of Ann Coulter. He then proceeded to talk about why they’re attractive, why he hates them, and the “hate f*** rating”.
No hate crime here. No demeaning of women. No sexist molestation. You conservatives are over-reacting. Presto chango, no more article! Laugh it off, it’s hilarious stuff describing all the creative ways a statist man can power-f**k a confident, conservative women, because Playboy magazine and Guy What’s-His-Name and Salon.com writer Gabriel Winant say it’s funny. These women deserve to be violated. But damn it, you’d better NOT be mean to a convicted pedophile or Obama welfare recipient, or the Democrats in Congress will have your hide. They have their priorities, after all.
Vile. Psychotic. Sexist. Sick.
It’s the Age of Obama, and bold dissenters WILL be punished. Today, punishment is in a Playboy top-ten hate-f**k list, tomorrow… you don’t want to know. Hope and change… I hate the change that is happening in America.
Vote all the liberals, all the Obama-bots, all the statists out in 2010. That’s change that gives me hope.
~~~~~
If you want to lodge a complaint via email to Playboy, check out Clinging to G & G: So Wrong… And No Longer the Playboy I Read. Roxy has written a great commentary piece and provides an email link that I’ve not seen posted on other blogs — let “the powers that be” at Playboy know how you feel about the hate-rape piece.
UPDATE: The url for this keeps changing or the link broken; preserved screenshots by Caleb of the original Playboy article (offensive language, R-rated), subject to being removed:
Caleb’s Blog, RedState: The Playboy Article (NSFW)
~~~~~
Related reading about this most recent hate:
Hot Air: It’s official: Playboy is a hate site; Update: Playboy pulled it and Bonnie Erbe: That Playboy “hate f***” piece was wrong but Malkin sort of deserved it and Video: Megyn Kelly unloads on Playboy
The New Agenda: Playboy: Now With More Misogyny!
Michelle Malkin: Socialist Bernie Sanders: We need more liberal media! and USA Today columnist blames Peeping Tom victim and This is what feminism looks like and Another day, another hate wish and Moron of the day
John Nolte, Big Hollywood: Bill Maher Brings His Own Stupid
RedState: A Climate of Hate
The Activist Conservative: The Playboy Article (screen shots of the entire original article before it was pulled, X-rated language)
Sister Toldjah: Playboy “playfully” advocates rape of popular conservative women writers and The Erin Andrews video controversy: Did she “deserve” it?
Media Lizzy & Friends: Playboy Writer Guy Cimbalo Shares Top 10 Republican Women He’d like to Rape
Atlas Shrugs: Playboy Does Atlas: ‘Hate F**KS’ Women They Could Never Touch, Literally or Figuratively
Daily Dose: Playboy Officially Hates Women, Conservative or Otherwise
Cube: Playboy Finds Prose Offensive, Censors Itself
Fire Andrea Mitchell!: Conservative women they’d like to “hate-f**k” – now pulled from Playboy site
The Powers That Be: Playboy Gets Classy: ‘Top 10 Conservative Women We’d Like to Hate F*#k’
Ed Driscoll, PajamasMedia: Playboy: In Like Flynt
Pink Elephant Pundit: Playboy Publishes Rape Fantasy List
Macsmind: Playboy opens itself to legal action
Stop The ACLU: Playboy, That Magazine Of Free Expression, Goes Major Hater
NewsBusters: Kos Kids Back at it – Wishing Death upon Michelle Malkin
Greg Gutfeld, Big Hollywood: Daily Gut: Standards
Garnette’s View: So, it is okay for Playboy to post about raping conservative women
The Cranky Conservative: The gutter just got lower
Don Surber: Lefty misogyny
Vets On The Watch: Erin Andrews Nude Video
William K. Wolfrum Chronicles: Playboy lowers itself to ranks of twisted fetish magazines
Right Wing News: Playboy’s Hit Piece On Conservative Women
Jezebel: Playboy On Conservative Women: “Castration Has Begun To Look Appealing”
Pundit & Pundette: Obama: no empathy for women?
About the author
Your article described the subhuman ramblings of an idiot in a most excellent manner but I take umbrage with your calling them \filthy animals\. The other animals don’t participate in such denigration of their female counterparts. Plus, these subhumans don’t possess the intelligence of the other animals.
As a conservative \latina\ woman, I am not at all surprized with the rantings of liberal frustrated men. I also am educated, Catholic and attractive and it all seems to both offend and intimidate weak liberal men. I’ll put it in their vernacular, \screw them\.
I duly apologize to you for my unintended insult to animals… “pond scum,” perhaps?
hehe…i think “pond scum” was an Ann Coulter term.
But yes…ANIMALS don’t treat their women this way. Only the most “sophisticated” of creations stoops to the levels we’ve found ourselves in.
Really? I quoted Ann Coulter with “pond scum”? Totally unintentional, but if I’m ever accused of plagiarism, I think it would be cool that I’d be caught stealing from Annie C. I have such respect and admiration for that woman.
And I agree with you, Josh. The way women are treated in the Middle East and other areas in the world is abominable. Here in the US, we’re suppose to be enlightened, but then women-hating garbage like this shows how many of us are not. I’m dumbfounded that liberal sites are STILL trying to justify their disgusting stance on the humor of conservative women being power-raped, but more and more folks are fighting back. Democrats and Republicans and Libertarians… it’s promising to see all thinking people, regardless of party affiliation, denouncing the “pond scum” who think rape is funny. Over at Daily Kos, believe it or not, there is an article wanting Michelle Malkin to be killed. I won’t link to it, but I was really tempted to, if only so that readers here could go to the site to denounce such an evil, left-wing extremist radical writer.
Thanks for popping in, Josh, and thanks for your input.
[...] remove something from the Internet and expect that it’s actually gone forever? *sigh*) – Frugal Cafe Blog Zone: No Hate Here at Playboy, Guys… Just Some Good Ol’, Fun-Lovin’ Power-Rape of Conservative [...]
It’s becoming more and more obvious that they own most of the media, (and are going after the rest of it).
They are afraid of conservatives that still have a voice in the media.
The 2010 election is going to be really interesting.
Vicki,…nice site.
Thank you, AFVET. As always, I appreciate your input.
God bless America!
[...] of Sarah Palin was an aberration not to be repeated again, you’re wrong. Check out this article by Vicki McClure Davidson at Frugal Cafe Blog Zone. The main target of a lefty troll who wrote a frighteningly vicious [...]
I am more left-leaning but I agree with the majority of this article – it doesn’t matter if you are liberal or conservative, black, white, green or purple – 99.99999% of humanity is a waste of skin.
I do have to somewhat defend Sandra Bernhard though. She was making a pretty good point when she said what she said about Sarah Palin. She was suggesting rape upon Sarah Palin so that Palin would understand what it would be like to be a 12-year-old girl raped and impregnated and forced to bear the rapists demon spawn under Palin’s extreme anti-abortion stance. You can’t be pro-child if you are willing to ruin one child’s life just to bring a potential demon-child into the world.
With all due respect, you’ve giving that foul-mouthed, vindictive Bernhard far too much credit. She has put a phony face on her rabid rage against Palin, a fraud of sensitive social awareness. No cogent point for the “greater good” was being made, Bernhard enjoys being as controversial in her shows as possible. She’s called Palin a whore and worse. A whore? Why is Palin a whore? She isn’t a whore, but Bernhard is blindly hurling every nasty word she can at a woman to marginalize her, a typical statist tactic. What social point is Bernhard making by calling her the “C” word and the “B” word, except to attack and hurt a conservative woman? And then, wishing Palin, (or anyone else who is pro-life), to be gang-raped because of their heartfelt decision to not support abortion is a positive stance that can be justified? No. There is no defense for rape or any other violence against a woman for expressing her opinion. In Afghanistan and other Middle Eastern countries, men have justified beating and killing their wives or daughters for defying them. It is their private code, and they can defend it just as zealously as Bernhard has for wanting harm to come to Palin for her beliefs. Palin does not impose her pro-life beliefs on Alaskans as governor, but stands by her priniciples on it for herself and has raised her children accordingly. Bernhard stands for nothing except controversy and muck-raking.
Palin has NEVER expressed making abortion illegal (if I’m wrong, please cite the source) and I know of no instance where she has crossed a line in preventing women from getting abortions.
Bernhard is pro-choice, as am I. But that is where our similarities end. I truly respect Palin and millions of others for taking their pro-life stance. Bernhard does not and jumps the shark with these violent ramblings:
“Now you got Uncle Women, like Sarah Palin, who jumps on the s–t and points her fingers at other women. Turncoat b—h! Don’t you f–kin’ reference Old Testament, bitch! You stay with your new Goyish crappy shiksa funky bulls–t! Don’t you touch my Old Testament, you b—h! Because we have left it open for interpre-ta-tion! It is no longer taken literally! You whore in your f–kin’ cheap New Vision cheap-ass plastic glasses and your [sneering voice] hair up. A Tina Fey-Megan Mullally brokedown bulls–t moment.”
Please show me the points of social awareness in that diatribe. These are not the normal urgings from a person who is trying to make an intelligent, salient point for pro-choice. They are hostile vilifications against Sarah Palin because she is a conservative Republican who was chosen to be a political running mate. I believe that Bernhard is not motivated by any rational convictions that by “suggesting rape upon Sarah Palin so that Palin would understand what it would be like to be a 12-year-old girl raped and impregnated…” Bernhard may be trying to whitewash for the media that her “rape wish” was wanting “social awareness.” Baloney.
Based on her body of her work to attack and marginalize Palin betrays her true irrational hate. She instead wants Palin to be raped because rape is one of the most degrading, heinous things to happen to a woman. And throwing in that it would be gang rape perpetrated by blacks means… what? That Bernhard thinks that “just” being raped isn’t enough to fully punish Palin? It must be done violently to Palin, multiple times, by men of color? What kind of social awareness and enlightenment message is THAT? It sounds more like misogyny and racism from Bernhard to me.
Jokes about rape are not funny. Period. Just as jokes about lynching blacks or castrating gays are not funny. They are twisted, hateful mindsets, disguised as gallows humor, but are instead a window into the depravity and bleakness of that person’s soul.
God forbid that any woman who is raped and is a pro-lifer that becomes pregnant must make personal decisions about that pregnancy. Palin faced that very, very difficult choice when she learned that baby Trig would be born with Downs Syndrome. My heart goes to any woman who must make that kind of personal decision. And it is indeed their own decision.
I actually pity Bernhard. What horrible things must have happened to her in her life that now, she encourages rape of a woman she does not know who does not share her beliefs on pro-choice? Anyone who does that should be pitied, because there is no tolerance nor respect for women. And the hate and violence they express for others is an extension of the hate, the self-loathing, they have for themselves.
So I don’t agree with you. But that is the beauty of our First Amendment. Bernhard, on the other hand, is abusing her First Amendment rights because she is advocating violence and attempting to incite violence. The First Amendment does not embrace that.
.
Fabulous piece on this, great site and blog too, you be linked. Just imagine the justified ‘Liberal’ outrage if say, ‘Hustler’ Magazine ran a disgusting parody where Rush, Hannity, Beck, Savage and Ann Coulter gang-raped and tickle-tortured Katie Couric, and then Nancy Pelosi.
Imagine. The outrage would last for months in the MSM. There would be calls for firings and boycotts. NOW would be apoplectic. Poor little outraged, hypocritical Libs.
absurd thought –
God of the Universe says
joke about raping women
if they are conservative
EVIL freedom lovers…
.
absurd thought -
God of the Universe says
always rape women…
who are conservative
they’re just gender traitors
.
[...] In one conservative blog that obviously DID get an opportunity to read the whole thing, Vickie McClure Davidson writes: [...]
The suggestion that a woman should be raped for her pro-life views would NEVER constitute “a pretty good point.” You are absolutely disgusting, truly a champion of your left-leaning cause. Talk about “demon spawn.” Surely you count among the 99.99999% of humanity whom you recognize as a waste of skin. Get help.
I totally agree, Jinjer. I’m sure many of our readers share your opinion.