<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ObamaCare Money Grab: &#8216;Taxing Your Mere Existence,&#8217; by William A. Jacobson</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.frugal-cafe.com/public_html/frugal-blog/frugal-cafe-blogzone/2009/08/19/obamacare-money-grab-taxing-your-mere-existence-by-william-a-jacobson/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.frugal-cafe.com/public_html/frugal-blog/frugal-cafe-blogzone/2009/08/19/obamacare-money-grab-taxing-your-mere-existence-by-william-a-jacobson/</link>
	<description>Where it&#039;s chic to be cheap... Conservative social &#38; political commentary, with frugality mixed in</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 17:31:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave B</title>
		<link>http://www.frugal-cafe.com/public_html/frugal-blog/frugal-cafe-blogzone/2009/08/19/obamacare-money-grab-taxing-your-mere-existence-by-william-a-jacobson/comment-page-1/#comment-9259</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 06:40:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frugal-cafe.com/public_html/frugal-blog/frugal-cafe-blogzone/?p=45001#comment-9259</guid>
		<description>There are so many issues at stake we have to choose our battles I guess. My first thought was that if the government wanted everyone to have health insurance then they should offer incentives to purchase your own plan.  Makes sense doesn&#039;t it? How about a 100 percent deduction or MORE for all money paid to procure a health insurance plan?  Doesn&#039;t that make sense?  A person makes $100,000 dollars a year, spends $15,000 a year for a health insurance plan then his adjusted income is $85,000 OR TWICE THAT to $70,000!  If a person has a pre-existing condition and pays double or triple then the government can cover that as well... now this same person has an income of $40,000 ... or  $0.00 after adjusting for what he or she pays in insurance for health coverage. That&#039;s why it has always been important to tax everyone, regardless of their income ... but fairly so as not to discourage them from making more money. 

People need a stake in the outcome of these programs or they&#039;ll continue to vote for others to take care of them.  A straight tax where someone makes $20,000 a year would result in &quot;x&quot; after deducting what they paid for health insurance.  I know of people that worked for nothing so that the business they worked for paid for their insurance.  The same goes for life insurance.  If a citizen takes care of his family&#039;s security by paying life insurance every year it should be deducted one hundred percent.  It helps us all not to add another burden on society if he or she dies and leaves his family dependent on  government. There are absolutely things the government can do for its people to reform the situation if they had the will to do it.  Tort reform might be a start.  Increasing competition might also reduce costs. Immigration reform? Repealing laws that encourage illegal immigration coverage so that American citizens don&#039;t pay exponentially for insurance might help. Until we see these types of things, we don&#039;t believe a single word being said to us.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are so many issues at stake we have to choose our battles I guess. My first thought was that if the government wanted everyone to have health insurance then they should offer incentives to purchase your own plan.  Makes sense doesn&#8217;t it? How about a 100 percent deduction or MORE for all money paid to procure a health insurance plan?  Doesn&#8217;t that make sense?  A person makes $100,000 dollars a year, spends $15,000 a year for a health insurance plan then his adjusted income is $85,000 OR TWICE THAT to $70,000!  If a person has a pre-existing condition and pays double or triple then the government can cover that as well&#8230; now this same person has an income of $40,000 &#8230; or  $0.00 after adjusting for what he or she pays in insurance for health coverage. That&#8217;s why it has always been important to tax everyone, regardless of their income &#8230; but fairly so as not to discourage them from making more money. </p>
<p>People need a stake in the outcome of these programs or they&#8217;ll continue to vote for others to take care of them.  A straight tax where someone makes $20,000 a year would result in &#8220;x&#8221; after deducting what they paid for health insurance.  I know of people that worked for nothing so that the business they worked for paid for their insurance.  The same goes for life insurance.  If a citizen takes care of his family&#8217;s security by paying life insurance every year it should be deducted one hundred percent.  It helps us all not to add another burden on society if he or she dies and leaves his family dependent on  government. There are absolutely things the government can do for its people to reform the situation if they had the will to do it.  Tort reform might be a start.  Increasing competition might also reduce costs. Immigration reform? Repealing laws that encourage illegal immigration coverage so that American citizens don&#8217;t pay exponentially for insurance might help. Until we see these types of things, we don&#8217;t believe a single word being said to us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

