Rollback of the Reagan Years: Rush Limbaugh Has Renamed Barack Obama “Dr. Kevorkian” Based on His National Suicide Nuclear Strategy
Posted By Vicki McClure Davidson on April 7, 2010
Conservative radio talk show host Rush Limbaugh really let Pres. Obama have it yesterday following POTUS’s troubling announcement of his new nuclear policy that will weaken America’s national defenses from enemy attack and tells all our enemies how we WON’T fight back. How America WON’T flex her muscles if attacked.
Blueprint for utter disaster, and making America a mocked beta dog now, under the woosy, go-ahead-and-bully-us, Kumbaya policies of Progressive Socialist in Chief Barry “I’m Desperate for Terrorists to Like Me” Obama. Even Iran’s president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad is laughing at him over this new nuclear security policy.
Limbaugh has renamed Obama “Dr. Kevorkian,” after the famous suicide assistance physician.
Here are portions of the transcript from yesterday’s EIB radio broadcast.
Rush Limbaugh transcript, Regime Leader “Dr. Kevorkian” Obama Tells World How to Hit Us
EIB Network
Broadcast April 6, 2010Barack Obama has announced today that he has given the Secret Service new rules of engagement in order to lessen the threats to public officials. Secret Service agents, government bodyguards, are not allowed to shoot any attacker who has a prior criminal record. Now, you might be asking, “How are they gonna know in the flash of a moment whether anybody has a prior criminal record if they’re taking a shot at a government official?” I have no idea. I have no idea. Just a new rule out there. It makes about as much as sense as the new rule here limiting our nuclear response. The great thing about our nuclear response is it was purposely unknown. You know, the deterrent factor.
The great characteristic or factor in our nuclear deterrence is that these weirdos around the world never knew when we would use it. So here comes “Dr. Kevorkian” — we have a brand-new name for the regime leader, “Dr. Kevorkian” committing national suicide, self-assisted on the United States of America — announcing to every regime out there under what circumstances they can nuke us or they can chemical weapon us or biological weapon us, and we won’t respond with our own nukes. So if I’m Mahmoud Ahmadinejad or if I’m Hugo Chavez, I say, “You know what? I don’t need to spend a whole bunch of money on nukes now. All I gotta do is figure out how to get some smallpox, some anthrax or other kinds of chemical weapons into the country, set ‘em off, and I know I’m safe ’cause Obama won’t nuke me even if he finds out I’m the one that did it.”
So, folks, how are we supposed to interpret this? Promoting peace? Okay, promoting peace. Well, I think we’ve had a pretty good record for peace with our existing nuclear policy, don’t you? I mean, for 65 years nobody’s nuked us. People fear us (or they did) and our retaliatory capabilities if they do take us. (interruption) Well, see, Snerdley [Limbaugh's producer], I know you’re making a joke, but you may actually have swerved into one of the key reasons for this, and that is Obama showing off. Obama is symbolically showing the rest of the world it’s a new country. “We don’t hate you; we’re not going to nuke you. You can nuke us, even. We deserve it! Well, you can’t nuke us, but you can biological weapon us. We may even deserve it, and we won’t hit you back very much.” He’s showing off. He’s preening before the world in a symbolic gesture.
Whether it’s to make the world like us or not, I couldn’t care less. It’s certainly not going to work. The people we want to like us, we have no problem with. The people that hate us that we want to like us, are never gonna like us. They’re just going to take advantage of this.
I think it was somebody at Power Line today who posed the question, “Does anybody really doubt that this regime would use nuclear weapons if it were necessary against an enemy?” And whoever wrote the piece at Power Line (I don’t have it front of me) said, “There’s no question in my mind that this regime would use nuclear weapons.” I’m not so sure they would. This is the point about this guy and this administration. He’s unilaterally disarming. He’s going to sign this big deal in Prague this week because he announced this in Prague. So the carbon footprint to get back over there and sign this thing with the Russians. The Russians, their foreign minister, somebody said today in Moscow, “Hey, look. You know, we reserve the right to pull out of this.” As Drudge reports that is Obama’s on a leash.
Now, what this is all about in Prague, you know, he said some time ago that we’re going to scrap the missile system for Eastern Europe to protect them against a reemerging communist Russia or maybe even an attempt to re-Sovietize the old Soviet Union. Obama pulled that, scrapped it, and now is going over to sign — in addition to that — the fact that we’re going to be reducing nuclear arsenals by a significant number, and the Russian foreign minister said, “Well, fine and dandy, but if we sense any movement on reestablishing a missile shield then we’re going to pull outta this thing.”
[...]
Say, folks, a little history lesson.
Do you remember what we did to our military after World War I? I mean, we’ve been here before. We’ve been here before. Right after World War I, the era after World War I, we sank a large percent of our Navy. We scuttled a lot of the rest of our forces and we practically did away with our standing army, which is why we could not react to Hitler when it would have been easier to slap him down. We had to ramp it up. We had to wait years to get into World War II, which was almost lost.
Why do you think we had Rosie the Riveter and why do you think we came out of the Depression? We had to rebuild our army and Navy and Air Force because we didn’t have it anymore, not after World War I. You know, if the Germans had not decided to invade the USSR, they mighta won World War II. Their big mistake was going in and aggravating the Russians. The Russians came in, of course, and history is history.
The worst thing about this is that the Russians will simply ignore the treaty. History is history; people are who they are. They constantly, they always ignore treaties. Every other arms treaty we’ve signed with them they’ve ignored. I don’t know if you remember this. It’s in the last year, 18 months, but Putin ordered their long-range strategic bombers to go back on 24/7 and 365 alert maybe a couple years ago. Those Bear Bombers are in the air like our B-52s used to be all the time. We’ve even closed the Strategic Air Command, SAC. We’ve shut that down. It was at Offutt Air Force Base. Well, I don’t think we shut it down, but we don’t have B-52s in the air at all times like we used to.
The Soviets, the Chinese, they have such a vast superiority in conventional weapons. We lead in delivery systems, but they have so many more conventional weapons than we do. The ChiComs and the Russians are actually happy to see us de-nuke because they have the advantage in weapons, which are conventional — and look at the country today. Look at how reluctant we are to fight a conventional war of even the smallest scale. Look at all the hell we got for a limited conventional war in Iraq.
So this is not good news happening out there this week and the next two weeks. We’re really watching the rollback of the Reagan revolution. We are taking ourselves back to the days before we won the Cold War with Barack “Dr. Kevorkian” Obama. Do you remember, folks, when the atomic bomb was first developed, it was hailed as the beginning of a golden age. There would not be the endless cycles of conventional wars that we had for generation after generation because the nuclear weapon would deter anybody attacking us. And for the most part it’s been true. We’ve used ‘em one time on the Japanese (well, twice, and they did attack us) and there hasn’t been a use of nuclear weapons since.
The deterrence of our existing nuclear policy is flawless in terms of having conventional war launched against it. Dealing with terrorist attacks is a different thing. But it’s a very serious problem that we face, and we’ve got a guy, Dr. Kevorkian now, running this regime who apparently is really serious about cutting this country down to size.
Related:
Legal Insurrection: No Nuclear Retaliation Without Due Process of Law and Weakness Is New Strength
Roger L. Simon, Pajamas Media: President Weirdo Goes Anti-Nuke
Of Thee I Sing 1776, Big Government: Obama’s Mideast Peace Process: No Process and No Peace
The Lonely Conservative: Ahmadinejad Mocks Obama’s Nuke Strategy
And so it goes in Shreveport: How Much More?
Frugal Café Blog Zone: Charles Krauthammer: Obama’s New Nuclear Policy Either Insane or Ridiculous (video) and Terror Hits Moscow Subway: Two Islamic Female Suicide Bombers Suspected in Killing at Least 38, Injuring More (video)
Pamela Geller, Atlas Shrugs: American Thinker: Obama’s Nuclear Poser Review
Patterico’s Pontifications: A Poll: Obama vs Limbaugh & Palin and Obama’s New Nuclear Policy and Possible Shoe-Bomber on DC-Denver Flight
On My Watch — The Writings of SamHenry: Defense on the Cheap – Obama’s Military Transition and Pullback
Gateway Pundit: 20 Years After Fall of Soviet Union Obama Signs Nuke Agreement With Russia and Newt Gingrich: Obama May Be “Most Dangerous President Ever” (Video) and Team Obama Bans “Islamic Radicalism” & “Jihad” From National Security Documents and Bill Ayers Continues to Defend Weather Underground Terror Attacks on His Blog
Ace of Spades HQ: Report: Obama Administration To Delete References To Islam From National Security Documents
Charging Elephant: Iran ridicules Obama’s nuclear strategy
Maggie’s Farm: Obama’s Secret Plan For Middle East?
Michelle Malkin: Our new national security plan: Weaken, whitewash, and wait for whirled peas
About the author
The plans Obama has for our country are disturbing. This is just th e tip of the ice berg I’m sure.
[...] Café: Rollback of the Reagan Years: Rush Limbaugh Has Renamed Barack Obama “Dr. Kevorkian” Based on Hi… and ClimateGate Grows: NASA Confesses “Tinkering” with Global Warming Data, Admits [...]