Frugal Café Blog Zone

Posted By Vicki McClure Davidson on September 14, 2010

From Financial Times: Graffiti - 'I don't believe in global warming'... Under water: In England, British street artist Banksy passes judgment.

The UK investigation into fraud and misconduct of science in Climate-Gate continues… although you certainly wouldn’t know it if you’re listening to and reading exclusively the US liberal press for news on the global warming fraud.

Anthropogenic global warming is the most elaborate hoax in all of history.

From The Register: MPs mull ‘climate enquiries’ that failed to enquire:

Might the University of East Anglia now rue its handling of the Climategate affair? An MP tells us that the University has ignored instructions given to it by the House of Commons Science Committee earlier this year, and MPs were given misleading impressions.

“Everybody on the Committee last time asked that there be no gaps between our report, and the Muir Russell report and the Oxburgh Report – but there are huge gaps. The Muir Russell people and the Oxburgh people didn’t talk to each other, so there were bound to be gaps,” says Committee veteran Graham Stringer MP. “We are left with the science left unlooked at.”

The allegations of misconduct and intellectual corruption raised by the release of the emails, data and source code last November are amongst the most serious British academia has ever heard. UEA responded with two internal enquiries, but MPs won’t let it lie. Members on the Commons Science Select Committee have summoned the two chairmen of the UEA enquiries back for further interrogation. At the first of these yesterday, the chairman of the Science Assessment Panel, Lord Ron Oxburgh, puzzled Committee MPs with his answers.
How the Panel was formed

When the University announced [1] the composition and role of the Science Assessment Panel, it billed it as an “independent internal reappraisal of the science”. In March the University’s Vice Chancellor Lord Acton confirmed the impression, telling the select committee that Oxburgh’s enquiry would “reassess the science and make sure there is nothing wrong”.

That was misleading, Oxburgh told MPs yesterday.

“I think that was inaccurate … You have to bear in mind the Vice Chancellor had been in the post for a month or so. It came as rather a deluge.”

Oxburgh pleaded time pressure.

“They wanted something within a month. There was no way our panel could in that time validate the science. If you wanted the science validated, you’d appoint another panel.

“We were meeting a deadline to help the University with a particular problem. Given our particular remit I don’t think we needed any more time.”

Oxburgh was proud that he’d used a non-confrontational approach. The CRU academics were interviewed just once, collectively, in private, and he’d rejected calls for televised proceedings. As Oxburgh described it, the enquiry sounded more like a health spa program for stressed executives.

“People wanted to bring television cameras in. Given the nature of the individuals concerned, we felt that we would get much more out of them, and get them to unwind and relax, and if indeed if they had chinks in their armour, to expose them, that if we did this in a much more relaxed way.

“Certainly one of the key people there is someone who is pretty highly-strung – and I think we were able to get him to relax and explain things.”

MPs were stone-faced at this. Oxburgh developed a nasty cough. So what had been the purpose of his enquiry?

Oxburgh at work

“I would chair a brief study, really, into the honesty of the people – not all the aspects of the science, we were not expected to go into the email saga. But they wanted evidence if people had been behaving dishonestly.”

MPs wondered how he could measure honesty.

“I think that we or the University would have been content had we said the researchers there were incompetent-but-honest, or misled-but-honest. We were looking for deliberate manipulation of data that led in a different direction to meet some pre-determined aspect of an agenda. We found none.”

This failed to impress Committee member Stringer, the MP told us today.

“One of the biggest attacks on Jones was by Professor [Doug] Keenan, it directly accused him of fraud. One would expect Jones’ use of Chinese data to come up. They had been very selective with what they’d put in and left out of their graphs, even if they hadn’t fiddled the figures,” said Stringer.

Stringer says the practices exposed at CRU undermine the scientific value of paleoclimatology, in which CRU is a world leader.

“When I asked Oxburgh if [Keith] Briffa [CRU academic] could reproduce his own results, he said in lots of cases he couldn’t.

“That just isn’t science. It’s literature. If somebody can’t reproduce their own results, and nobody else can, then what is that work doing in the scientific journals?”

The depth and rigour of Oxburgh’s panel also raised eyebrows. Oxburgh said the intensive interrogation (described above) had taken several days, but FOIA requests show his team of seven spent just two days on the job, clocking up “45 man hours” including lunches and coffee breaks. The final report amounted to five pages of assessment.

Although the Science Assessment Panel didn’t publish notes, MPs have seen a highly critical assessment of CRU’s work by Cambridge physics Professor Michael Kelly [2]. [PDF [3], 540kb], who has acted as a scientific advisor to government.

Kelly quoted Ernest Rutherford, who once said that “if your experiment needs statistics, you ought to have done a better experiment”. Complex simulations that can’t be exhaustively tested against ‘real’ data have limited value.

“I take real exception to having simulation runs described as experiments (without at least the qualification of ‘computer’ experiments). It does a disservice to centuries of real experimentation and allows simulations output to be considered as a real data. This last is a very serious matter, as it can lead to the idea that real ‘real data’ might be wrong simply because it disagrees with the models.”

There is more, so check it out.

I particularly loved this…

Observational evidence doesn’t find the higher temperatures in the troposphere that the models confidently predicted. The implication is clear: our level of understanding of the climate is much lower than the climatologists claim it to be, and politicians should be careful when devising policy based on the output of computer models.

In fact, this arises quite often in climatology – as we saw here [4]. It provides a good illustration:

Douglass et al. Temperature time trends (degrees per decade) against pressure (altitude) for 22 averaged models (shown in red) and 10 observational data sets (blue and green lines). Only at the surface are the mean of the models and the mean of observations seen to agree, within the uncertainties.

More on the review at The Register: Parliament misled over Climategate report, says MP

Related stuff:
Founding Bloggers: Climate Panel Admits They Can’t Defend Their Work
Sister Toldjah: WH wants to change “global warming” to “global climate disruption”
The Powers That Be: This Week’s ‘Al Gore Jr. Award for Environmental Hypocrisy’ Goes To…
Frugal Café Blog Zone: Pat Sajak’s Solution to “Manmade Global Warming” Has Merit and Remember Al Gore’s “Global Warming” Hoax? People & Cattle in South America Are Dying from Extreme Cold in July and Much Cooler Summer Temps in Southern California, Fruits & Vegetables May Not Ripen and ClimateGate Grows: NASA Confesses “Tinkering” with Global Warming Data, Admits Unreliable, Inferior Climate Warming Research and Stop the Insanity, Stop Global Whining (video) and Mega-Icy News: Frozen Like Popsicles, Growing Number of Ships Trapped in Ice in Baltic Sea Near Sweden and The Unraveling of the Global Warming Scare Stories & “Reckless Propaganda”… Al Gore’s Desperate Op-Ed in NYT and More AGW Lies: IPPC’s False Global Warming Hurricane Data, Donald Trump Slams Al Gore & Demands Gore’s Nobel Peace Prize Be Returned and Glaciergate: Global Warming Is Bogus, Just a Money Scam… IPCC Admits Himalayan Glaciers AREN’T Melting Away
Green Hell Blog: Mann blames heat wave on manmade warming and Obama beaten back for now on climate!
Ace of Spades HQ: Administrative Court Upholds Yucca Mountain; Obama’s End Run Around Congress Foiled For Now
Motor City Times: The Grass Isn’t Greener For Green Energy Industry: Windmill Company Vestas Loses $154 Million Last Quarter and EPA Is Using Global Warming Hoax To Seize More Control From States and The EPA’s Mission Creep: Environmental Justice and Plan EJ 2014
Gateway Pundit: Figures. Harry Reid Arrives at Green Summit in Fleet of Gas Guzzlers and Top UN Scientist: There Never Was Consensus on Global Warming – Only a Few Dozen Believed It and Dem’s Racist Tanning Tax Goes Into Effect – White Folks Feel Burned and IT BEGINS… Obama Initiates His Coal-Killing Policies; Energy Costs to Skyrocket and Brrrr… Scientists Issue New Warning of Imminent Food & Ethanol Shortages Due to Global Cooling and Brrrr… Severe Mongolia Winter Causes Humanitarian Disaster
HillBuzz: The collapse of the Church of Anthropogenic Global Warming could take the entire Democrat Party and American Media down with it
Nice Deb: John Holdren Urging People To Use Term: “Global Climate Disruption” Instead of “Global Warming” and Facing Doom In November, Dems Do What They Do Best: Blame Everyone But Themselves For Lousy Economy and Catholic Bishops Jump On Global Warming Bandwagon Just As Wheels Are Falling Off the Hoax and AlGore Delivers The Most Boring And Depressing Commencement Speech In History
Watts Up With That?: IPCC’s “Africagate” blunder as told by Dr. Richard North
Noel Sheppard, NewsBusters: Study: Global Warming Reduces Hurricanes, Will Media Notice?
GayPatriot: If global warming science is settled, why resort to ad hominem?
Patterico’s Pontifications: ClimateGate’s Dr. Phil Jones
Michelle Malkin: The global warming scandal of the century deepens
Hot Air: Former CRU chief admits warming may not be unprecedented and Breitbart TV looks back on Byrd, Boxer, Klobuchar blaming lack of snow on AGW
Doug Bandow, American Spectator: Time for a Sacrifice to the Snow Gods
Hennessy’s View: Astonishing Science: Sun May Cause Global Warming
Christian Science Monitor: Deadly cold snap hits Argentina, Uruguay, Chile

Categories: Environment and Earth, Government, Social and Political Climate
Tags: AGW, anthropogenic global warming, Britain, climate change, CRU, global warming, global warming lies, MP, Muir Russell report, Oxburgh Report, science, Science Assessment Panel, UK